We
came from completely different backgrounds, but somehow, our
relationship worked. Chuck
was from a working class neighborhood on the South Side of Chicago; I
grew up the child of educated, professional parents in a bedroom
community of
Los Angeles.
Perhaps
it was a shared culture of the sixties that brought us together--when
Motown music, sex and politics combined to create a special identity for
us baby boomers. Perhaps it
was our common affinities for art and philosophy.
Perhaps we recognized and appreciated in each other qualities we
hadn’t found in anyone else. Perhaps
it was a combination of all these things, but one thing is for certain:
it had little to do with religion.
Because
I’ve always felt like a resident alien among Christians -- especially
the active proselytizers -- marrying Chuck, who was Jewish, did not
require any particular “leap of faith” for me.
In fact, I’ve always been more comfortable with Jews as a group
than any other culture--not so much for their religious position as
for their cultural orientation. My
late husband Chuck Greenberg, an accomplished recording and performing
artist with the Grammy-winning band Shadowfax, was an embodiment of all
those traits I find so attractive in my Jewish friends:
artistic, intelligent, compassionate, and funny (he once
completely cracked up our very serious childbirth class by yelling
“group grope” during a practice exercise).
Ironically,
when we met, Chuck was losing interest in Judaism just as I was gaining
it. Along with the musical
transformation that was taking place in his external world during the
late sixties, Chuck was experiencing an internal transformation.
Against the wishes of his parents, he dropped out of college and
began focusing entirely on music while growing his curly red hair into a
long, unruly mass. Causing
further consternation within his family, Chuck began smoking pot and--although he had been raised in a Conservative household and been bar
mitzvahed -- he stopped going to temple and celebrating Jewish holidays.
Meanwhile,
two thousand miles away in California, I was discovering Judaism while distancing myself
from the birth religion of my parents: Christianity.
I’m not sure why, but I never “got” Jesus.
Perhaps it was my laissez-faire upbringing by a father who,
forced to attend the local Methodist church every Sunday as a kid,
revolted as an adult and announced that he would never return to church
himself. He did, however,
offer to take me if I wished to attend.
Well, what kid would choose Sunday School over Sunday sleep-in?
And if regular church-going hadn’t made him a True Believer,
what could I hope to gain from it?
There
were few Jews in my sheltered suburban locality when I was growing up.
An important exception was my father’s best friend Gary Gould,
a fellow aerospace engineer who had fled
Germany
during World War II, lived in Brooklyn
where he learned English (with a
Brooklyn
accent) and met and married another Jewish émigré
who had hidden in a French convent during the war.
Daisy Gould was a fabulous cook and the only person I’ve ever
known who could create such culinary exotica as escargot with her own
home-cultivated snails. She
also made a killer lasagna.
In
having the Goulds as family friends, my father managed to renounce the
anti-Semitic beliefs of his mother, who regaled us with stories about
renting her house in Atlantic City
during the summers to “rich Philadelphia Jews”
who would invariably trash it. Because
my grandfather had died before my father was born--leaving Gram
strapped financially -- these summer rentals provided much-needed
income. And because she made
it her home during the rest of the year,
Gram took the carelessness of her renters very personally.
Nonetheless, my father was not influenced by her anti-Semitic
diatribes, and consequently neither was I.
After all, even a naif can understand that few renters take as
good care of a home as its owner.
How
do children know when their elders are so off-base with their biases
that they should be ignored? Perhaps
it is part of the ubiquitous rite of passage for teens who reject
everything their parents say. Perhaps
this is why Chuck was rejecting his Jewish past while I began embracing
it. Whatever the reason, my
father and I never took Gram’s denunciations seriously.
Her stereotyped descriptions and our own reality were totally at
odds. After all, the Goulds
were far more cultivated than the slovenly renters depicted by my
grandmother. Furthermore,
the Gould home was immaculate.
As
much as I loved the Goulds, it was Anne Frank who really piqued my
curiosity about Jewish culture. I
fell in love with reading following my pre-teen discovery of Diary of a
Young Girl . I fell in love
with Jews, too. In my
callowness, there was something tragically romantic about them that
appealed to my own adolescent, unexpressed yearnings, something so
"je ne
sais quoi." Inspired, I began
keeping a diary myself. Never mind that my diary, unlike Anne’s, was
filled with sophomoric sexual references and drawings illustrating
concerns that were rather different from Anne’s loftier philosophical
reveries. The most prurient
passage I can remember from the book was a description of getting her
period for the first time. Perhaps
the salacious references were edited out at the time.
Whatever, Anne’s journal fired a desire for knowledge about
Jews more realistic than what my Gram offered.
And I knew this quest would not be satisfied in my WASP-filled
suburban L.A.
hometown.
Subsequently,
it was my philo-Semitic father who encouraged me to attend Barnard
College
in New York City, despite the reactions of some who said things like,
“why would you want to go to a place where there are so many Jews?”
Little did they know, nor did I tell them, that this was
precisely why I wanted to go there.
And like Nathan Englander’s “Gilgul of Park Avenue,” whose
improbable epiphany in the backseat of a taxi convinced him that he was
Jewish, I felt an immediate bond with my new friends.
Indeed, I welcomed their esoteric contributions to my heretofore
sheltered life upon arriving at Barnard in 1967, a move which proved
especially fortuitous in that it was through my induction into the famed
“Jewish Geography” network that I ultimately met Chuck.
Chuck’s
loss of religious faith had to do partially with coming of age in the
sixties. Did the loss of
faith in our government because of the Vietnam War render those of us
who were young then permanently challenged to believe in anything?
People now speak of a “loss of innocence” following the
events of
September 11, 2001. But
Chuck and I--as with many others like us--lost our innocence in 1968
with the realization that a government elected to protect us was, in
fact, lying to us, tear-gassing us, chasing us down the street with
their mounted police, and even shooting at us with its National Guard.
And
so it was that Chuck--always interested in political science and even
majoring in it for the brief time he attended college--lost faith in
all institutions: religious,
social and political. Our
backgrounds may have been very different but about these concepts we
were in complete agreement. We
understood that our “revered” institutions had created an insane and
unjust world and it was our responsibility to come up with something
that worked better. I
believe that the mutual experience of this chaotic time period, more
than any other factor, is what bonded us.
We married in 1981, a year after we met.
Of
course, I had to convince Chuck that the family institution was not as
dispensable as religion and politics.
When I first met him, he made a point of letting me know he was
“never getting married and never having children. Little
musician-killers” he called them.
On the other hand, I--having lost both parents by the time I
met Chuck--had decided I needed a family.
And, armed with the belief that children of unwed parents are
unfairly--and unnecessarily--stigmatized, I wanted to be married
before having children. Needless
to say, Chuck eventually changed his mind, albeit not without the
proverbial kicking and screaming.
It
did help to have the support of his family.
In Chuck’s mother Janice I could not have found a more ideal
mother-in-law. My not being
Jewish was never a problem for her.
In fact, she has told me that I am more Jewish “in spirit”
than many “real” Jews she knows.
The fact that I reinstated Passover and Hanukkah into Chuck’s
lapsed-Jew life was not lost on her.
I suspect that she was relieved that Chuck--her first-born but
last-wed--finally had
gotten hitched. Whatever her
reasoning, Janice welcomed me into her family.
Her three other, younger children had already wed goyim--how
could she complain about another one?
I
suppose that in some ways I am like John Berryman:
an “Imaginary Jew,” forced to take positions on issues like
Zionism and civil rights that stereotypically concern Jews.
Fortunately, these days when I am asked if I am Jewish, it is not
usually with the same apparent contempt and disdain as during
Berryman’s 1940s wartime America. Of
course, anti-Semitism still persists, but I would like to think that in
some small way I am helping to dispel the myths and prejudices about
Jews which continue to prevail, particularly in the aftermath of the World
Trade
Center
attack which has stirred up anti-Israel sentiment.
These
anti-Jewish attitudes become particularly noticeable in the
unsophisticated cultural wasteland of my present Central California
community where it is not uncommon to hear
discussions like the one Chuck and I overheard years ago while having
breakfast in a restaurant favored by the local working class.
Next to us were three cowboys, and though we ordinarily didn’t
make it a practice to eavesdrop on other conversations, we couldn’t
help but hear them arguing noisily about whether Jews were “a race or
a religion.”
“Just
look at them big noses,” one was saying. “Gotta be a race with them
big noses!”
Although
Chuck’s reaction was to cover his rather small nose with a hand,
showing, as usual, his indomitable humor, I was steamed.
“That
does it! Before our sons
have to hear this stuff at school, they’re gonna find out what it
means to be Jewish!”
Thus
began our Torah
School
stint. As
luck would have it, we found a Reform temple in San Luis Obispo
that catered to “bicultural” families such as
ours. However, not all
congregations and rabbis were as accepting as Congregation Beth David.
When
I had lived in Manhattan
in 1976 and the possibility of marriage to my
pre-Chuck Jewish boyfriend raised itself, I toyed with the idea of
converting to Judaism, but the commitment part always hung me up:
I’ve never felt so sure about something that I could totally
embrace it in the manner that “conversion” has always implied to me.
For one thing, I’m a confirmed agnostic.
For another, hearing some Jews snicker about converted shiksas
“trying to out-Jew the Jews” has not further enamored me of the
conversion concept.
My
usual defense for taking Chuck’s surname when we married, as opposed
to following the feminist fashion of retaining one’s maiden name, is
that--in an eerie foreshadowing of his death--a paralegal had
advised me once that having the same name as my husband would make it
easier to collect his Social Security survivor benefits.
However, in hindsight, I think the real reason I changed it was
to become Jewish without “officially” converting.
The simplest way to achieve this was to acquire a Jewish name.
Of
course, where I now live, this nuance is lost on most.
There are so few Greenbergs here that the locals think we must
all be related. Little do
they know that in some New York
phone books there are hundreds, if not thousands of
Greenbergs. I have assumed
the unenviable task of setting these rubes straight, but it is not easy
when my next-door-neighbor is a Jehovah’s Witness and has taken me on
as her little conversion “project”
and when the high school-sanctioned Christian club posts a
“hit-list” on their meeting room wall of all “infidels”--read
“Jews”--whom they want to convert.
Lately,
it’s the ill-informed local bigots who blame the fundamentalist
Islamic hatred of the U.S.
on American support of Israel
whom I’m attempting to set straight.
Recently I was asked how to criticize
Israel
without being labeled anti-Semitic.
In my replies, I use my un-Jewish maiden name when I sign my
letters-to-the-editor since I don’t particularly desire having crosses
burned on my lawn, hate mail sent to my home, or my sons accosted at
school. For the same reason
I have refrained from reporting the Christian club to the A.C.L.U., even
though its sanctioning by a public school clearly violates the
separation of church and state. It
saddens me that despite everything we may have learned from
the Holocaust, anti-Semitism thrives.
Now,
it’s just my sons who seem concerned that I am or am not Jewish and
enjoy reminding me of this fact often, to which I invariably counter,
“Well, neither are you,” to which they reply, “Yes, but more than
you are.” They seem to
derive some sort of superiority out of being at least one-half Jewish.
I suppose that is a good thing, for it means I’ve done my job:
I’ve contributed to society three men who are proud of their
heritage while at the same time being more tolerant than most of
cultural differences.
My
eldest son has lost no time immersing himself in Jewish culture since
moving away from home to attend college in Southern California.
He has
begun hanging out with the local Hillel group whose members have asked
him to be the campus Israel Advocacy Representative.
He also has decided to minor in Jewish Studies and to visit
Israel
during his Winter Break.
He says you can get bar-mitzvahed there.
“What, like a quickie divorce in Vegas?” I ask.
He rolls his eyes in reply. I
shall be giving him a bullet-proof vest for Hanukkah.