When
I was little, I wrote letters to trees. I convinced myself that not only
could trees walk, talk, and think, but they had feelings as well. I was
also certain that I was the only one to ever discover this.
My belief in
the human qualities in trees stemmed partly from my readings of C.S. Lewis and my identification with the young and,
in my mind, persecuted Lucy. In Prince Caspian of Narnia, Lucy had awakened
the trees and I thought that in
Ithaca, New York,
I could do the same.
As
a child I believed that trees, plants, and nature in general were
talking all the time, but that we as humans had lost the ability to hear
them. Using the logic of a four year old, I concluded that since trees
spoke a different language than humans, I would write to them. I then
initiated my younger sister into the secret and together we composed a
letter that ran something like this:
"Deer trees, wee no you can
talk." (I still have this letter). Following that came our 'stepes
for taking care of trees' and I quote: "Water them. Dont let
anebodee clime them for 2 days. Let all birds and creetures have
freedom! If its freezing cold breeth warm breath on them. Keep P. And
all S.P. cleen!"
I have no idea what 'p' and 's.p.'
were.
Inside the letter came a tiny map of the small forest behind our house
with the caption 'map' at the bottom. This map was used as a crude
navigation guide during my own walks in the woods. Whenever I went, I
brought with me my book on trees, a notebook, and the stuffed
seal in whom I confided when there were no convenient shrubs. I was a
strange child and, as yet, oblivious to the fact.
However,
I did not remain oblivious long. One cannot be four forever; I was
nearing the age of seven when I discovered that most of my playmates did
not talk to trees--nor did they write letters to them. I was considered
weird by all except my best friend, Cynthia, and my younger sister Sarah,
who were as convinced as I that trees could talk. However, our
conviction faded with the discovery that there was no tooth fairy. Santa
Claus had long ago ceased to exist but there was still the mysterious
quarter that always appeared on time to keep us hoping--until the night
we decided to stay awake so that we could confront this fairy once and
for all.
Somehow
we managed to avoid sleep the entire night; instead we lay listening to
the wind rustle our curtains (the window was open because fairies fly)
and the soft striation of the crickets. Morning came without a tooth
fairy or a quarter. When the trees also continued growing in silence we
began to doubt. A final, desperate letter begging them to speak---a week
of waiting---and it was over. No letter, whisper, or sigh descended from
their branches and our letter lay unanswered on the grass.
Feeling like martyrs, we read Foxe's Book and held a dramatic letter
burning over our fireplace in which all except the two quoted epistles
disappeared. A year later my family moved and the cold, unresponsive
tree was left behind. For Sarah and me, nature was dead, which meant we
no longer had to agonize over paper or plastic at the supermarket. We
unflinchingly chose paper. I think it was the 'death' of trees and the
numerous books I had read that drove me to the written word in times of
stress. If a tree would not respond, I was certain an audience would.
Dramatic
tales and myths then followed which I read to a bored audience
consisting of Sarah, age five, and Abagail, age three. I discovered that
three year olds do not appreciate myths. I had turned from nature as a
way of dealing with stress to writing---surely an audience of two would
be less fickle then a mute tree.
Even
so, a large amount of the tree-knowledge I amassed during my childhood
stayed with me: I can still identify some trees by their leaves.
Presumably, the original tree is still standing in Ithaca
somewhere; it waits both literally and figuratively.
Nature always remains for one to return, but once abandoned, it is hard
to come back to. Nature stays the same, but people change: they
'grow up' in the sense that they use the social codes of their world.
Consequently, I 'grew out' of trees and nature, and thus lost a part of
my courage to stand against accepted thought and live for what I believe
in. Even if it is slightly deluded.
There
is a line to a song I like that accurately states what I am trying to
describe:
"If I'm right then you are wrong / If I'm wrong then I
really lived".
Wordsworth was right: Man needs to return to nature.
Nature was created as a refuge for man; there is no better way to
connect than withdrawing to it during times of stress or anxiety. Some
elements of man's description of nature and its aspects may have been
wrong, or slightly off. But even if all of the presumptions about
nature were wrong, as long as one retains a connection with it, one would still have experienced life. Our fast-paced world tends to detract
from the value of life and cause us to lose our focus and priority.
Nature has a way of bringing this back, and infusing one with a fresh
strength to stand up and be different.
I
still do crazy things, but usually only in foreign countries (like New York City) where no one is likely to know me, and if they do,
they can successfully pretend that they don't. There is something
refreshing about dancing around with an umbrella in
Central Park
when it isn't raining, glancing up at the sky, and
saying "tut, tut, it looks like rain".
Central Park
or something akin to it will always be there, but
the humans might not. I've yet to encounter anyone else with a gray
umbrella on a sunny day in Central Park;
but I hope that someone, umbrella or no umbrella, will be there. Humans
need to stay in touch with nature whether humanity or human's society
changes. I might have lost my own touch, but I'm working on bringing it
back. Hey, it takes courage to dance around with an umbrella!